The geopolitical landscape of Africa is shifting. The Alliance of Sahel States (AES) — comprising Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger — has officially broken ties with the West and is now seeking alignment with BRICS. This bold move sparks both hope and concern: is BRICS the liberator Africa needs, or merely a new master in disguise?
🔄 Breaking Away from the West
On January 29, 2025, AES announced its formal withdrawal from ECOWAS, the West African regional bloc. The decision was driven by long-standing frustration over Western interference, economic sanctions, and a perceived lack of respect for national sovereignty. The AES leadership — all of whom came to power through military coups — now seeks a new geopolitical direction, free from the colonial legacy of France and the political pressures of the United States.
Instead, their attention turns to BRICS — the economic alliance of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, recently expanded to include Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt, and Ethiopia.
Advertisement
🤝 Why BRICS?
BRICS presents itself as an alternative to Western dominance. It offers:
- No political strings attached
- Investment in infrastructure and technology
- Respect for national sovereignty
For AES, this is appealing. Russia provides military support without conditions. China invests in roads, railways, and energy. India and Brazil show interest in agriculture and resource development. South Africa acts as a bridge between the continent and the rest of the bloc.
Julius Malema, leader of South Africa’s opposition party Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), is a vocal advocate of this shift.
“Africa must free itself from economic slavery. We don’t need new masters — we need freedom,” Malema declared.
⚠️ But Is BRICS Truly Better?
While BRICS may seem like a fresh start, it’s not without risks.
1. China’s Debt Trap Diplomacy
China’s Belt and Road Initiative has led to massive infrastructure projects across Africa. But many countries — including Zambia, Kenya, and Ethiopia — now struggle with unsustainable debt. Some ports and railways have already fallen under Chinese control.
2. Russian Military Influence
Russia supplies weapons and mercenaries to AES nations, often through the Wagner Group. This bolsters authoritarian regimes and undermines democratic institutions. What does Russia expect in return?
3. No Shared Vision on Human Rights
BRICS lacks a unified stance on democracy, press freedom, or civil liberties. This could normalize authoritarian governance in AES countries.
đź“Š BRICS vs. the West: A Comparison
| Feature | BRICS | Western Powers |
|---|---|---|
| Political Conditions | None | Yes (democracy, human rights) |
| Economic Support | Infrastructure, loans | Aid, trade, sanctions |
| Policy Influence | Indirect | Direct |
| Risk of Dependency | High (China, Russia) | High (IMF, World Bank) |
đź”® What Comes Next?
Africa’s future doesn’t hinge on choosing between BRICS and the West. The real challenge lies in building internal strength:
- Strengthening regional cooperation through the African Union and AfCFTA
- Ensuring transparent agreements with all partners
- Promoting citizen participation in geopolitical decisions
đź’¬ Final Thoughts
AES has made a historic move by severing ties with the West. BRICS offers opportunities — but also dangers. Julius Malema’s vision of a free and self-reliant Africa is compelling, but it must be accompanied by critical vigilance.
Africa doesn’t need new masters. It needs sovereignty, transparency, and solidarity.
Whether BRICS becomes a liberator or another exploiter will depend on how Africa defines the terms of engagement. One thing is clear: waiting passively is no longer an option. It’s time for action, vision, and African leadership.
Dutch Echo 
Leave a comment