Rotterdam – If you’ve been scrolling through your feed, you might have caught Israel’s recent announcement that it struck a Hamas command post in Doha, Qatar, taking out multiple senior operatives. It was billed as a high-precision raid on foreign soil—an unmistakable message that nowhere is off-limits. But beneath the military bravado lies a tangle of unanswered questions: Did Israel really eliminate its targets? What does this move mean for regional diplomacy, Netanyahu’s political standing, and even Israel’s own economy? Let’s unpack the story from A to Z, in language that speaks to twenty- and thirty-somethings in Rotterdam and beyond.
1. The Doha Strike: Unpacking the Claim
Late August saw Israeli jets and drones swoop over West Bay Lagoon in Doha, targeting a gated compound where Hamas negotiators were reportedly meeting U.S. mediators. Days later, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took personal responsibility, declaring that Israel had “neutralized several top Hamas figures.”
Hamas vehemently denied it. Their official statement insists no senior leadership was harmed, only a handful of lower-ranking militants and one Qatari security officer. Journalists on the ground filmed smoldering wreckage, but no bodies of high-value targets. Israel, meanwhile, points to undisclosed signals intelligence and intercepted radio chatter as proof—sources outsiders can’t verify.
Advertisement
On the surface, such a strike reinforces Israel’s deterrent image: “We can reach you anywhere.” But the diplomatic fallout with Qatar and deeper strategic costs suggest the political price tag may be steeper than the supposed battlefield victory.
2. Revisiting 7 October: Myths and Realities
To understand the shockwaves this Doha raid generated, you need to rewind to 7 October 2023. That day, Hamas launched an unprecedented multi-front assault on southern Israel—rockets, paragliders, pickup trucks, even motorbikes—breaching what many had assumed was one of the world’s most secure borders.
Here’s what really happened:
- Hamas unleashed a massive rocket salvo, blinding Israeli radar and severing communications.
- Concurrent waves of militants punched through gaps in fences and anti-vehicle ditches at multiple points, exploiting a rare lapse in Israeli intelligence assessments.
- Israeli witnesses—Nova festival-goers and border police—described chaos, but their stories barely broke out of Hebrew-language local media. International outlets were fixated on the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.
Conspiracy theories flourished: “There were no soldiers!” “It was an inside job!” In truth, border-police and small army detachments stood guard, but they were overwhelmed and under-equipped for a large-scale coordinated attack. The real surprise wasn’t the absence of troops, but the magnitude and synchronization of Hamas’s tactics.
3. Netanyahu in the Spotlight: Authorizer, Financier, or Strategist?
Benjamin Netanyahu has been front and center in every twist of this saga. Critics accuse him of:
- Personally green-lighting every targeted strike, even without iron-clad evidence.
- Presiding over policies that funnel Israeli-collected taxes into Gaza—indirectly bankrolling Hamas.
- Waging wars to distract from his own mounting legal troubles, including a long-running corruption trial.
There’s truth to some of it.
On point 1: Netanyahu did publicly claim credit for the Doha operation, leaning heavily on secret intelligence that he won’t share. That tactic rallies his right-wing base, but invites skepticism among moderates.
Point 2 is surprisingly straightforward: Israel collects VAT and customs duties on goods bound for Gaza, then transfers them to the Palestinian Authority. Since Hamas seized power in 2007, a slice of those revenues ends up in Hamas hands. Meanwhile, Israel silently allowed Qatar to truck millions in cash—officially for humanitarian use—into Gaza via Israeli-controlled border crossings.
Point 3, the “war-to-stall-trial” theory, is more speculative. Netanyahu’s corruption proceedings began in late 2024, and yes, litigation slowed as courts deferred sessions during the Gaza war. But there’s no smoking-gun memo showing he actively stoked conflict to buy time. The 7 October assault was Hamas’s doing, not his.
4. Cash Flow Conundrum: How Israel’s Own Money Reaches Hamas
It sounds paradoxical: Israel, under Netanyahu’s watch, ends up funding its own sworn enemy. Two main pipelines explain how:
- Tax collection for Gaza
Before 2007, the Palestinian Authority (PA) managed VAT and customs duties on imports to Gaza. Israel still collects those fees on Gaza-bound goods, then channels the money through PA accounts. With Hamas effectively running Gaza, a portion of that revenue finds its way into government payrolls—salaries for civil servants, public utilities, and, yes, security apparatuses. - Qatar’s cash caravans
Since early 2021, Qatar has shipped millions of dollars in suitcases into Gaza, under an agreement brokered with Israeli approval. Ostensibly earmarked for hospitals, fuel, and salaries, the cash goes through Israeli customs and banking checks before it’s handed to Hamas’s finance ministry. Right-wing Israeli politicians decry this as “we are arming our enemies with our own money,” demanding the pipelines be cut. But the counterargument warns of a humanitarian collapse if you slam shut every aid valve.
5. The Abraham Accords Under Strain
Flash back to August 2020: Israel signs the Abraham Accords with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, quickly followed by Sudan and Morocco. The offers? Direct flights, tech partnerships, green-energy projects, intelligence-sharing against Iran—all brokered by Washington.
Fast-forward to today, and the glow has faded:
- Saudi normalization talks have been iced since early 2024, with Riyadh demanding an Israeli freeze on new settlements. The Gaza conflict shut down last-ditch diplomacy.
- The UAE, Bahrain, and Oman have suspended top-level contacts with Israel, condemning its strike on Qatari soil as a breach of Arab sovereignty—even as they stop short of embracing Hamas.
The takeaway: while strategic calculations against Iran still bind Gulf states and Israel together, public opinion and Arab solidarity with Qatar and the Palestinian cause can quickly derail normalization. Soft power proved just as fragile as hard power was forceful.
6. Gulf Solidarity and Regional Ripples
When Israeli munitions fell on Doha, Qatar’s neighbors rallied fast:
- The UAE, Kuwait, Egypt, and Jordan publicly condemned the attack as a violation of international law and Qatari sovereignty.
- Leaders flew into Doha for high-profile solidarity visits, sending a clear message: “You mess with one of us, you mess with all of us.”
- Yet behind the charade of denunciations, many Gulf capitals quietly maintain back-channel cooperation with Israel on security, counterterrorism, and trade.
This dual stance—public outrage, private pragmatism—underscores the delicate juggling act regional powers perform. They want technological know-how and defense ties with Israel without alienating their domestic audiences or being seen as abandoning the Palestinian struggle.
7. Economic Toll Back Home
Wars cost money, and wars far from home cost double. Israel’s defense budget jumped by 65 percent in 2024, pushing military spending to nearly 9 percent of GDP—on par with peak wartime outlays in Ukraine. Key pain points include:
Advertisement
- Investor flight
The enormous Norwegian pension fund NBIM dumped stakes in five major Israeli banks and defense-related firms, citing public pressure over Gaza operations. Other global funds have paused new investments altogether. - Labor shortages
Over 300,000 reservists have been mobilized, leaving companies in tech, hospitality, and agriculture scrambling for workers. Some firms offer bonuses to free-lance personnel; others have shuttered operations temporarily. - Financing the war
To avoid slapping heavy taxes on citizens mid-crisis, Israel leans on local pension funds and external debt. That strategy keeps households unscathed for now but balloons the national debt to nearly 70 percent of GDP.
Yet the high-tech sector remains a silver lining, generating 20 percent of GDP and more than half of exports. Start-ups are relocating headquarters to Amsterdam or Silicon Valley, but R&D stays in Israel, buoyed by government grants and accelerated innovation driven by wartime needs.
8. War Fatigue: Israel’s Waning Domestic Support
“Rally-’round-the-flag” effects gave Netanyahu a post-7 October boost north of 90 percent approval for military action. By mid-2025, that figure slipped to around 60 percent. The biggest shifts:
- Younger Israelis (under 35) express the strongest desire for a negotiated ceasefire or international mediation. They’re less inclined to see military escalation as the only path.
- Middle-class parents worry about inflation, childcare costs, and disrupted schooling as reservist spouses miss months of family life.
- Families of fallen soldiers deliver the most poignant protests, demanding hostage-negotiations and diplomatic solutions rather than open-ended offensives.
Tel Aviv squares and student campuses have seen fringe anti-war rallies—small but symbolic reminders that not every Israeli citizen equates strength with endless fighting.
9. Strategic Success or Diplomatic Debacle?
On paper, striking deep in Qatar underscores Israel’s global reach and zero-tolerance policy toward Hamas. Yet the broader fallout raises red flags:
- Diplomatic isolation among former Abraham-Accord partners, who now question Israel’s reliability as a sovereign neighbor.
- Eroded U.S. mediation channels: Washington historically used Doha as a back-channel to negotiate hostage releases and ceasefires. That conduit is now severely compromised.
- Iran’s rejoinder: Tehran seized on Israel’s apparent breach of Qatari airspace to rally proxy militias on multiple fronts, from Lebanon to Yemen.
In the long run, when you burn bridges for tactical gain, you risk losing the very allies you’ll need for future conflicts or peace talks.
10. What Lies Ahead for Israel and the Region?
So where do things go from here? Three key flashpoints to watch:
- Resumption of Saudi-Israeli talks
Riyadh holds the power to reshape Middle East geopolitics. If normalization resumes, it will hinge on serious concessions from Israel—likely a settlement freeze and credible steps toward Palestinian statehood. - Netanyahu’s political calculus
The strike may shore up his right-wing base now, but growing war weariness, an ongoing corruption trial, and the so-called “Qatargate” scandal involving covert payments could fracture his coalition once hostilities abate. - Rebuilding trust with Gulf partners
Israel needs to mend fences in Abu Dhabi and Manama if it hopes to salvage the Abraham Accords framework. That means balancing hard security guarantees against Iran with respect for Arab sovereignty and regional norms.
For twenty- and thirty-somethings in Rotterdam, it’s a stark reminder: global power plays rarely trade in simple victories or defeats. They’re messy, expensive, and full of unintended consequences.
Your Turn
What do you think? Did Israel score a decisive blow in Doha, or did it overplay its hand—sacrificing diplomatic capital for a questionable military win? Drop your thoughts on dutchecho.com, share this article with friends, and let’s keep the conversation going. After all, understanding these tangled geopolitics helps us make sense of our own world.
Dutch Echo 
Leave a comment