How Ukraine, Russia, the US, and Europe Are Locking Each Other in Place This Winter
Rotterdam – The war in Ukraine has dragged on for nearly four years. What began in February 2022 as a brutal invasion has turned into a grinding conflict that reshapes not only cities and lives but also the balance of global power. In late November 2025, there was a flicker of hope: Washington presented a peace plan, negotiations followed, but no breakthrough came. As winter sets in, millions of Ukrainians face freezing nights without reliable electricity or heating, while the world watches leaders play a high-stakes game that feels more like deadlock than diplomacy.
The American Proposal: A Deal with Sharp Edges
The United States stepped forward with a plan that was supposed to end the war. First drafted as 28 points, later cut down to 19, the proposal leaned heavily on concessions from Ukraine.
- Territory: Ukraine would formally recognize Crimea and the Donbas as Russian.
- Military downsizing: Kyiv’s armed forces would shrink from around 850,000 troops to somewhere between 400,000 and 600,000.
- No NATO membership: Ukraine would enshrine in its Constitution that it will never join NATO.
- Weapons restrictions: Long-range missile systems would be dismantled.
- Non-aggression pact: Russia, Ukraine, and Europe would sign a treaty promising not to attack each other.
For Kyiv, this felt less like peace and more like surrender. For Moscow, it was still not enough. Russia wants full recognition of its territorial claims and ironclad guarantees that Ukraine will never again pose a threat.
Advertisement
Why Talks Fell Apart
The negotiations collapsed because both sides refused to budge.
- Ukraine refuses to give up territory or weaken its military while Russian troops remain on its borders.
- Russia refuses to settle for anything less than full recognition of its gains and permanent exclusion of Ukraine from NATO.
- The US pressures Ukraine by hinting that military aid and intelligence could be cut off if Kyiv doesn’t accept the deal.
- Europe feels sidelined, watching from the margins as Washington and Moscow dominate the conversation.
The outcome: no agreement, no ceasefire, just another round of talks that ended in frustration. Analysts describe it as a failed negotiation, though the American plan lingers as a reference point for future discussions.
Winter in the Cold
While diplomats argue, civilians suffer. Russia has targeted Ukraine’s energy infrastructure with relentless missile and drone strikes. Power plants, substations, and high-voltage lines have been destroyed. The result: widespread blackouts and heating failures.
The Red Cross warns that seven out of ten households are entering winter without reserves. Last year, sixty percent of Ukrainians already lacked enough food, and half had no stable access to water or electricity. This year looks worse.
International aid is arriving — generators, blankets, warm clothing — but the scale of destruction makes it feel like patchwork. In Kyiv, Kharkiv, and Odesa, the hum of portable generators fills the streets, while families huddle around improvised stoves.
Russia: Big but Exhausted
Russian propaganda paints a picture of victory. Reality is harsher.
- Manpower losses: Hundreds of thousands of soldiers have been killed or deserted.
- Equipment shortages: Tanks and armored vehicles are depleted; improvised solutions like motorcycles and even electric scooters are being used in combat.
- Economic strain: The war economy runs at full speed, but sanctions bite hard, reserves shrink, and labor shortages grow.
- Strategic stagnation: Russia has captured Avdiivka and pushed toward Pokrovsk, but these gains are seen as meager compared to the enormous costs.
Experts argue that Russia cannot fight indefinitely. It may outlast Ukraine in sheer numbers, but exhaustion is inevitable.
Europe: Support and Frustration
Since 2022, the European Union has poured tens of billions into Ukraine. In 2024, a four-year package worth €50 billion was approved, designed to keep Ukraine afloat until 2027.
Yet frustration runs deep. European capitals complain that they are excluded from the peace talks. The European Parliament openly criticized the US for sidelining the EU. Germany faces economic troubles and a budget crisis, though it is far from bankrupt. France and Poland push for a stronger European role.
Despite these tensions, Europe continues to supply weapons and financial aid. The question is not whether Europe can afford it — the funds are already allocated — but whether political will can hold.
Trump’s Double Game
President Trump plays both sides. On one hand, he maintains close contact with Moscow. On the other, he pressures Kyiv to accept the deal.
- Threats: If Ukraine refuses, the US could cut off weapons and intelligence.
- Framing: For Trump, the priority is presenting a peace deal as a diplomatic victory.
- Reality: Russia is asked for minimal concessions, while Ukraine is expected to sacrifice the most.
The impression is clear: Washington wants a quick deal that can be marketed as success, even if it feels like defeat for Kyiv.
NATO and Europe: Inside Yet Outside
Formally, NATO members cannot be excluded from decisions that affect the alliance. In practice, they are. The American plan is not a NATO initiative but a bilateral effort. That leaves countries like Germany, France, and Poland with little direct influence.
This creates tension. If a peace deal is signed without European input, it could weaken NATO’s unity and deepen divisions within the EU.
How Long Can This Go On?
The big question is endurance.
- Russia: Can keep fighting for a few more years, but not forever. Losses and economic strain are mounting.
- Ukraine: Relies heavily on Western support. Without US weapons and intelligence, its position weakens dramatically.
- Europe: Financially and militarily capable of continued support, but political fatigue grows.
- US: Trump wants a deal, but one that fits his narrative more than Ukraine’s survival.
The danger is that the war becomes an endless grind, with no clear victory for either side, only continued suffering.
Rotterdam’s Perspective
From Rotterdam, the war feels both distant and close. Distant, because the battles rage thousands of kilometers away. Close, because the consequences ripple through energy prices, political debates, and the sense of security across Europe.
The city’s port, one of the largest in the world, is a reminder of how interconnected economies are. Sanctions on Russia, rerouted trade flows, and the global energy crunch all pass through Rotterdam’s docks. The war is not just about tanks and trenches; it’s about supply chains, markets, and the everyday rhythm of life.
Conclusion: A Stalemate with No Winners
The peace talks of November 2025 did not deliver peace. The American plan demanded too much from Ukraine and too little from Russia. Europe was sidelined, civilians froze, and leaders argued.
What remains is a fragile stalemate. Diplomacy, propaganda, and military pressure lock the conflict in place. Peace feels both near and unreachable.
Epilogue: The Silence of Winter
In Ukraine’s cities, the sound of generators hums through the night. Families gather around improvised stoves, trying to stay warm. Above them, drones buzz and missiles strike.
In Washington and Moscow, leaders debate terms and conditions. In Brussels and Berlin, frustration grows. In Rotterdam, people watch the news and wonder how long this can last.
The war has become more than a battlefield. It is a test of endurance, of politics, of humanity. And as winter deepens, the silence of cold nights speaks louder than any speech.
Dutch Echo 
Leave a comment